Kano Emir, Muhammadu Sanusi 11, Raises Concerns Over FG's Fresh Borrowing Of $516 million
Emir of Kano and former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Muhammadu Sanusi II, has raised concerns over the Federal Government’s continued reliance on borrowing despite the removal of petrol subsidy.
Emir of Kano and former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Muhammadu Sanusi II, has raised concerns over the Federal Government’s continued reliance on borrowing despite the removal of petrol subsidy.
Sanusi spoke in an interview on News Central TV on Friday, warning that weak fiscal discipline could undermine the gains expected from recent economic reforms.
Sanusi, who had long criticised the subsidy regime, described fresh borrowings as unsustainable. He further faulted the country’s previous dependence on foreign refineries while domestic facilities remained underutilised.
Sanusi spoke in an interview on News Central TV on Friday, warning that weak fiscal discipline could undermine the gains expected from recent economic reforms.
Sanusi, who had long criticised the subsidy regime, described fresh borrowings as unsustainable. He further faulted the country’s previous dependence on foreign refineries while domestic facilities remained underutilised.
However, in spite of backing the policy direction, of the Federal Government, Emir Sanusi, questioned the sequencing and timing of the reforms, particularly the removal of subsidy and liberalisation of the foreign exchange market.
He argued that implementing such measures in a loose monetary environment contributed to the sharp depreciation of the naira.
His words, “We cannot continue supporting foreign refineries as an oil-producing country while our own refineries are not functioning.
“Today, we have our own domestic refinery. We are no longer importing petroleum products; we are even exporting to Europe. That is positive for the economy...
He argued that implementing such measures in a loose monetary environment contributed to the sharp depreciation of the naira.
His words, “We cannot continue supporting foreign refineries as an oil-producing country while our own refineries are not functioning.
“Today, we have our own domestic refinery. We are no longer importing petroleum products; we are even exporting to Europe. That is positive for the economy...
“Artificial exchange rates, especially when you’re printing money, cannot work. There was going to be a devaluation.
“For me, removing subsidy or liberalising exchange rates, these are good interventions. Were they done at the right time? Those are certain questions. Were there other things that should be done that have not been done? These are other issues.
“Liberalising the exchange rate in a loose monetary environment contributed to the currency’s rapid depreciation.
“It’s not enough to say, oh, they removed subsidy. You had to. When you get to a point where 100% of your revenue goes into debt service, you cannot continue. Where is the money going to come from?
“However, if you decide to remove subsidy and liberalise exchange rates in an environment of very loose monetary conditions, before you have tightened money supply, the Naira drops to a bottomless pit. That was a timing issue.
“We’ve removed the subsidy. We’re now spending it. What we should not see is fiscal consolidation. You cannot remove wastages and continue borrowing. I’ve said this before. You need to see the benefits. If you’re not paying the subsidy and you’ve got the money, why are we still borrowing and borrowing? What are we borrowing for?”
His comments come against the backdrop of controversy over a fresh loan request by President Bola Tinubu, for approval of a fresh loan of $516 million by the Senate for sections of the proposed Sokoto–Badagry Super highway.
Tinubu had in a letter to Senate President Godswill Akpabio, said the 1,000-kilometre project was intended to connect Nigeria’s North-West and South-West regions.
However, the fresh borrowing plan has sparked harsh criticisms from several quarters, including former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, who described the project as though commendable but urged the government to explore alternative funding options instead of increasing debt.
“For me, removing subsidy or liberalising exchange rates, these are good interventions. Were they done at the right time? Those are certain questions. Were there other things that should be done that have not been done? These are other issues.
“Liberalising the exchange rate in a loose monetary environment contributed to the currency’s rapid depreciation.
“It’s not enough to say, oh, they removed subsidy. You had to. When you get to a point where 100% of your revenue goes into debt service, you cannot continue. Where is the money going to come from?
“However, if you decide to remove subsidy and liberalise exchange rates in an environment of very loose monetary conditions, before you have tightened money supply, the Naira drops to a bottomless pit. That was a timing issue.
“We’ve removed the subsidy. We’re now spending it. What we should not see is fiscal consolidation. You cannot remove wastages and continue borrowing. I’ve said this before. You need to see the benefits. If you’re not paying the subsidy and you’ve got the money, why are we still borrowing and borrowing? What are we borrowing for?”
His comments come against the backdrop of controversy over a fresh loan request by President Bola Tinubu, for approval of a fresh loan of $516 million by the Senate for sections of the proposed Sokoto–Badagry Super highway.
Tinubu had in a letter to Senate President Godswill Akpabio, said the 1,000-kilometre project was intended to connect Nigeria’s North-West and South-West regions.
However, the fresh borrowing plan has sparked harsh criticisms from several quarters, including former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, who described the project as though commendable but urged the government to explore alternative funding options instead of increasing debt.
What's Your Reaction?
