Shehu Sani Angry As North Whip Up Ethnic Sentiments Against Tinubu, Says President Can’t Be Blamed For Insecurity
Senator Shehu Sani has accused the northern part of Nigeria of whipping up ethnic and sectional sentiment against President Bola Tinubu, adding that the opposition should stop blaming the president for insecurity in the region.
Sani represented Kaduna Central in the National Assembly.
Sani recalled that northerners held almost all security agencies from 2015 to 2023, during the late President Muhammadu Buhari administration, yet insecurity in the North was at its peak throughout the period, compared to the situation now that it has abated.
His words, “Kidnappings are still going on in some parts of the states, and there are still bandit attacks in some parts of the states.
“These were politicians who were once in PDP and they were once in APC, and they failed to address those fundamental issues which today they are raising their eyebrow and raising a lot of propaganda.
“What is happening today in the northern part of Nigeria is that there is ethnic and sectional sentiment being whipped up against the person of Mr President for political reasons. Well, to me, I know it very well that the problems we are facing as a country today is not different from the one we faced when Buhari was in power.
“When Buhari was at the helm of affairs of this country, he came from the northern part of Nigeria, and at a certain time, when he was in power, almost all the security apparatus of this country was headed by northerners.
“The Chief of Defence Staff was from the north, the Chief of Army Staff was from the north, the Chief of Air Staff was from the north, the Chief of Naval Staff was from the north.
“We even had a Minister of Defence who came from Zamfara State. At that very time, the Controller General of Nigerian Customs Service, Hamid Ali, was from the north.
“So if those people who held those positions and manning the security and defence apparatus of the state could not automatically address the insecurity that pervades the North with the snap of a finger, so how are you expecting that others should be able to do that?
“And let us put it into proper perspective. When Buhari took over office from 2015 to 2019, he was not able to address the banditry in the North. He was not able to address the terrorism in the northeastern part of Nigeria. What did they do? They said they should give him a second chance so that he would be able to do it. So what is the difference at this very time?
“I know that in politics you can use every weapon for you to get into power, but you shouldn’t lie. The idea of even saying that subsidy will be returned, for anyone who has been to school, not just anyone who has been to school, anyone who is knowledgeable on the economics of oil importation and the reality of Nigeria’s economy knows that it was simply an outright deception.
“I can understand if a Nigerian presidential candidate will say, I will reactivate and refurbish Nigeria’s refinery so that we can refine our product and sell it to our people. But for anyone to profess that the alternative to the removal of subsidy is reintroduction of subsidy, not reactivation of our refinery, shows how clueless they are in their own economic thinking.”
What's Your Reaction?